Your post or comment may also be removed if it contains an inherently political image, as it's likely to result in a political shitstorm in the comments. Don't bring them here, there are plenty of other places, such as r/gunpolitics, to share your thoughts. Political Discussions are routinely toxic. If you want to share your bad experience to inform someone, that's fine - but that requires more effort than say "lol poverty pistol you'll regret it" or things like that. HOWEVER, do not piss in someone's Cornflakes because they posted about their brand new gun and you have a bone to pick. This is valuable information for the 1911 community. Please feel encouraged to share your experiences with guns, brands, customer service, etc - even negative ones. If that's all you post, expect to be asked to stop, or forced to stop if you don't oblige. Please do not spam this sub with low-effort content such as memes. This rule is subjective and up to Moderator discretion. A mistake is one thing, malicious action will result in a permanent ban. You may share OFFICIAL links to OFFICIAL web sites, but do NOT try to circumvent the spirit of this rule in any way. Please don't get banned over this, just avoid this discussion altogether. Even just talking about it can be enough. Reddit will ban this sub if people use it to facilitate private firearms transactions. NOTE: It doesn't have to be an actual 1911, as long as it's in the 1911 bloodline. Other subs exist to talk about other types of guns. There is no obligatory insult when expressing opinions, so don't include them. We all disagree, but keep your attitudes in check. Walton, also of The Moving Picture News summed up the film and stated, 'Good teaching as to woman's 'class', but as to details sadly lax.' The New York Dramatic Mirror panned the film beginning with, 'Nothing more improbable or inconsistent has been seen on the screen in some time.' The reviewer concluded the review of the improbable plot as to having been 'dreamed up by a ten-year-old girl.Just don't be a jerk. Jeanval of The Moving Picture News found the baron to be boorish by shading a lady's hand with a glove on and wondered at how Thanhouser was able to film the prison scenes. While the reviewer stated that no magistrate would have sent the man to jail for assault with a blunt knife, it was the jail substitution via a changing of clothes which proved to be impossible. The Morning Telegraph, like others, found the story to be foolish and completely improbable on many accounts. The film was met with a wide variety of reviews by critics with the majority proving to be negative. The single reel drama, approximately 1,000 feet long, was released on February 17, 1911. The reel demonstrates how easily evidence of this sort may be made to entangle and ensnare a totally innocent man.' Release and reception Checkmate 1911 8 Round Mag We are incredibly appreciative of the support from John and the M1911 community over the years and look forward to continuing returning the favor. I'm here to answer any questions you may have on our mags or 1911 mags in general. The serious nature of the film was highlighted with the advertising of the film by Thanhouser which states, ' Checkmate carries a message and a lesson to those who value the 'circumstantial evidence' process by which so many convictions are obtained in our criminal courts. My name is Brandon and I handle the Commercial Sales division at Check-Mate Industries. Checkmate wove a more tangled web of circumstantial evidence and intrigue and the resolution comes not from an astute female detective, but by the heiress's novel substitution of a doppelgänger to the prison so that the original can get the needed confession. Love and Law was a film which garnered some criticism for an improbable plot. The first such Thanhouser film to tackle the subject was Love and Law released in December 1910. Bowers notes that such convictions were a known social issue, but not a pressing one in 1911. Lonergan would produce several scenarios featuring the problems with circumstantial evidence being used to obtain convictions. David Bowers notes that the plot dealing with circumstantial evidence focused on one of Lloyd Lonergan's social issues. The only known credit for the film is that it starred William Garwood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |