![]() I think Signal did it right, and it obviously paid off. We all know how it goes, when something requires extra work, and it is not absolutely necessary, people just give it up. I don't know enough about Thunderbird inner workings to say if it is even possible with a plugin, but I think it would be a big step in making Bitmessage more popular, and allow people to use it without the inconvenience of having to maintain 2 separate programs. Attaching Bitmessage to the Bitcoin mining power means that Bitmessage benefits from the overwhelming amount of security that comes with Bitcoin's mining power, but it would mean that the value of a Bitmessage broadcast is tied to the value of a bitcoin, which would make it harder to send a broadcast in Bitmessage. People would still use a software they are familiar with, but they could also send encrypted messages to others who can receive them. I think this comes down to ease-of-use vs. My first thought was obviously some kind of integration with Thunderbird. ![]() Not everyone is using Signal, and having the possibility to still send messages to users who don't, without having to change app is the key.īitmessage is a great idea, but it lacks this possibility to send messages to people who haven't (yet) switched to it. I think the fact that it still allows, within the same app, to access and use the "old feature" (in this case, texts) played a big role in its success. We have all seen in the past few weeks how Signal (Android/iOS encrypted messaging app) has grown in popularity (between 1 and 5 million downloads on Android at the time of this writing). Outgoing messages contain no explicit address of the recipient of the message.This is just a suggestion, you may close it if you are not interested. Therefore, every network participant tries to decrypt every message passing through the network even if the message was not originally intended for that network participant. Since only the actual recipient can successfully decrypt the messages intended for him, all network participants know that if they fail to decrypt the message then the message was not intended for them. ![]() We propose a system where users exchange a hash of a public key that also functions as the user’s address. If the public key can be obtained by the underlying protocol, then it can easily be hashed to verify that it belongs to the intended recipient. It appears that a user's public key (or, a hash of their public key) is their messaging address.Īn example address would be: BM‐2nTX1KchxgnmHvy9ntCN9r7sgKTraxczzyE. Thus, there is nothing to verify: when you send a message to user with public key P, you don't need to verify that your recipient's public key is really P, because you have identified your recipient solely by his public key.Īs for how to tell if a public key belongs to a particular real-world entity: you can't, just as you can't easily verify that a particular email address belongs to a particular real-world entity.įor example, you want to send Alice a message. Alice advertises her Bitmessage address (e.g., on her business cards, on her public website, etc.) as BM‐2nTX1KchxgnmHvy9ntCN9r7sgKTraxczzyE. You make a P2P Bitmessage request to get the public key associated with BM‐2nTX1KchxgnmHvy9ntCN9r7sgKTraxczzyE. When you have fetched the key, you quickly verify that its fingerprint matches the one in Alice's address. digital png 824x1304px 47.12KB Device Pitstop iPhone Smartphone Handheld. Then, you use the Bitmessage system to encrypt your message so it is readable only by Alice's private key.īut how did you know that BM‐2nTX1KchxgnmHvy9ntCN9r7sgKTraxczzyE is really Alice's address? Maybe someone printed out fake business cards, or hijacked Alice's website to change her address. Digital preservation, Digitalisation, electronic Device, bit, message png. \Users\johnl\OneDrive\Desktop\bit\Bitmessage-0.6.164. Even if throw-away email addresses are used, users must connect to an email server to send and retrieve messages, revealing their IP address.Īnd when talking about broadcast messages (emphasis mine): In fact, the lack of connection between an address and a real-world entity seems to be branded as a feature: Maybe so, but if they did, that's not a problem that Bitmessage is designed to solve. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. This would allow an individual or organization to anonymously publish content using an authenticated identity to everyone who wishes to listen. ![]() Select the version for Python 2.7 (look for 'Py2.7' in the file name). Look for the links to downloads under the heading labeled 'Binary Package ' the binary package versions are already compiled for you. ![]() The primary use for BitMessage (as presented in the paper, anyway) seems to be the ability to sent messages that are from a cryptographically verified source, but that source is free to avoid identifying themselves in any real-world way. PyQt is one of Bitmessages two dependencies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |